Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Immigrants from Oceania
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
12.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,481,648 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 9.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 35.6% | 12.9% |
Range | 34.0% | 11.9% |
Mean | 9.5% | 6.0% |
Median | 7.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |