Immigrants from Australia vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,991,630 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.173% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 173.5 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $43,685, a difference of 32.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $93,665, a difference of 23.8%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $102,368, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $51,230, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $59,656, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 20.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.99%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 25.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.86%), currently married (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 85.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 62.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.6%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.7%).