Immigrants from Oceania vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,942,525 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of French within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 22.4 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and French communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 11.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $59,656, a difference of 8.0%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $83,468, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $55,350, a difference of 0.65%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $46,296, a difference of 2.9%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $43,685, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and French communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 17.7%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.63%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and French communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 9.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.10, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and French communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.24%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.8%).