Navajo vs Lumbee Female Disability
COMPARE
Navajo
Lumbee
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Navajo
Lumbee
14.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Lumbee Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,768,780 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,288,474 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 11.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 5.4% |
| Maximum | 37.8% | 41.7% |
| Range | 33.8% | 36.3% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 19.7% |
| Median | 15.4% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 22.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and Lumbee by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Comanche (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Native/Alaskan (14.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 0.55%), Cape Verdean (14.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and Osage (14.3%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Creek (15.7%, a difference of 0.68%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 2.3%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and Colville (15.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |