Native/Alaskan vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Choctaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Choctaw
19.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,255,067 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,568,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 15.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Choctaw |
Minimum | 4.3% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 70.7% | 95.0% |
Mean | 31.7% | 30.9% |
Median | 29.9% | 23.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.5% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.8% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.2% | 20.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Choctaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (20.2%, a difference of 2.7%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and Colville (18.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Osage (16.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |