Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Somalia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,912,322 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Somalia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to a decrease of 18.2 Immigrants from Somalia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $86,987, a difference of 19.1%), median household income ($87,553 compared to $74,300, a difference of 17.8%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $37,914, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $48,135, a difference of 8.8%), and median earnings ($48,041 compared to $43,100, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 28.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 7.7%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 16.1%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and family households (62.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.45%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.2%).