Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Ethiopia
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,427,583 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 30.2% | 28.7% |
Range | 28.2% | 28.3% |
Mean | 12.4% | 12.7% |
Median | 12.1% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |