Yugoslavian vs South American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
South American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
South American Indians
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
28.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs South American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,514,214 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 5.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 30.2% | 68.3% |
| Range | 28.2% | 65.9% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 17.0% |
| Median | 12.1% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 22.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 12.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Arab (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Uganda (13.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Iraqi (13.7%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
| Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |