Yugoslavian vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Scotch-Irish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Scotch-Irish
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 30.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 28.2% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 19.2% |
| Median | 12.1% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |