Yugoslavian vs Taiwanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Taiwanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Taiwanese
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Taiwanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,695,393 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 0.16%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Taiwanese |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 30.2% | 33.0% |
| Range | 28.2% | 31.4% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 12.8% |
| Median | 12.1% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Taiwanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |