Yugoslavian vs Pennsylvania German Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Pennsylvania German
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Pennsylvania Germans
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
67.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Pennsylvania German Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,998,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Pennsylvania German |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 30.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 28.2% | 96.6% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 19.5% |
| Median | 12.1% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 21.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 21.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Pennsylvania Germans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |