Slavic In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Slavic
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Slavic In Labor Force | Age 20-64
79.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
54.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,879,770 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.352 and weighted average of 79.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.66% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Slavs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Slavs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Slavs by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Switzerland (79.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belgium (79.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (79.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (79.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Laotian (79.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 64.6 /100 | #163 | Good 79.7% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 64.4 /100 | #164 | Good 79.7% |
| Nigerians | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 79.7% |
| Okinawans | 62.7 /100 | #166 | Good 79.6% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 62.0 /100 | #167 | Good 79.6% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 61.8 /100 | #168 | Good 79.6% |
| Laotians | 58.4 /100 | #169 | Average 79.6% |
| Slavs | 54.0 /100 | #170 | Average 79.6% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 53.3 /100 | #171 | Average 79.6% |
| Immigrants from Belgium | 53.1 /100 | #172 | Average 79.6% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 52.4 /100 | #173 | Average 79.6% |
| Syrians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 79.6% |
| Cubans | 46.1 /100 | #175 | Average 79.5% |
| Australians | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 79.5% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 79.5% |
Slavic In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.050% | 40.9% |
| Maximum | 32.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 32.4% | 59.1% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 77.8% |
| Median | 4.7% | 79.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 71.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 83.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 11.2% |
Correlation Details
| Slavic Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.050% | 241,123,728 | 79.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 19,822,491 | 79.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 5,286,141 | 79.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 1,950,471 | 78.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,071,042 | 79.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 521,179 | 81.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 281,520 | 79.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 266,034 | 78.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 146,866 | 82.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 136,366 | 78.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 42,737 | 80.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 45,605 | 78.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 36,918 | 81.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 20,446 | 77.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 36,891 | 79.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 5,525 | 72.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 5,818 | 78.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 23,398 | 72.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.05% | 3,539 | 86.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 12,305 | 87.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 3,108 | 78.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 3,571 | 71.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 3,184 | 81.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 4,404 | 83.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.02% | 921 | 74.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 290 | 66.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 672 | 79.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 2,910 | 89.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 691 | 70.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 2,804 | 87.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 970 | 74.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 2,536 | 63.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 420 | 70.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 595 | 65.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 686 | 81.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 526 | 71.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 498 | 58.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.25% | 304 | 83.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 702 | 68.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.62% | 665 | 71.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 150 | 97.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.94% | 2,493 | 83.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 768 | 69.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.61% | 197 | 92.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.42% | 95 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 149 | 95.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.35% | 1,251 | 80.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.48% | 306 | 65.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69% | 949 | 82.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 223 | 75.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.03% | 309 | 89.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.14% | 365 | 90.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.67% | 75 | 87.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.83% | 120 | 100.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.55% | 526 | 45.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 154 | 83.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.50% | 995 | 59.9% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.02% | 746 | 40.9% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.46% | 422 | 62.7% |