Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar In Labor Force | Age 20-64
79.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
64.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,360,396 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091 and weighted average of 79.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.13% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Costa Rica (79.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Nigerian (79.7%, a difference of 0.0%), German (79.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Okinawan (79.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Cuba (79.7%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Immigrants from China | 69.1 /100 | #157 | Good 79.7% |
Austrians | 67.6 /100 | #158 | Good 79.7% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 66.7 /100 | #159 | Good 79.7% |
Moroccans | 66.7 /100 | #160 | Good 79.7% |
South Africans | 66.2 /100 | #161 | Good 79.7% |
Germans | 65.2 /100 | #162 | Good 79.7% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica | 64.6 /100 | #163 | Good 79.7% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 64.4 /100 | #164 | Good 79.7% |
Nigerians | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 79.7% |
Okinawans | 62.7 /100 | #166 | Good 79.6% |
Immigrants from Iraq | 62.0 /100 | #167 | Good 79.6% |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 61.8 /100 | #168 | Good 79.6% |
Laotians | 58.4 /100 | #169 | Average 79.6% |
Slavs | 54.0 /100 | #170 | Average 79.6% |
Immigrants from Switzerland | 53.3 /100 | #171 | Average 79.6% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.038% | 60.6% |
Maximum | 17.4% | 86.4% |
Range | 17.4% | 25.8% |
Mean | 3.3% | 78.7% |
Median | 2.6% | 79.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 77.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 80.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.5% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 109,818,160 | 79.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 28,045,145 | 79.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 10,635,484 | 80.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 4,443,055 | 80.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 3,397,342 | 81.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 2,425,227 | 78.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 2,461,502 | 79.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,513,851 | 80.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,356,368 | 80.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 1,123,551 | 78.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 636,007 | 78.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 594,101 | 80.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 1,357,765 | 81.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 423,092 | 79.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 438,016 | 80.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 223,860 | 80.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 406,228 | 78.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 310,391 | 79.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 392,187 | 79.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 182,155 | 77.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 185,148 | 82.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 432,147 | 78.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 19,626 | 85.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 256,522 | 84.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 35,419 | 76.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 55,094 | 82.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 12,866 | 74.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 52,234 | 82.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 133,569 | 80.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 126,252 | 79.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 48,939 | 80.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 85,513 | 81.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.81% | 35,349 | 74.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 24,684 | 72.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 94,089 | 73.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 24,971 | 78.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.27% | 33,912 | 82.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.34% | 15,556 | 80.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 58,574 | 79.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 12,010 | 74.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 3,126 | 60.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 23,980 | 74.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 57,662 | 78.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 15,899 | 84.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.12% | 25,699 | 62.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 23,879 | 80.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 81,015 | 76.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 2,039 | 77.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.48% | 2,029 | 80.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 14,553 | 77.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.78% | 2,219 | 86.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 5,268 | 74.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 37,834 | 80.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.45% | 19,501 | 72.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.88% | 19,613 | 73.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 39,082 | 85.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 56,794 | 76.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.70% | 1,035 | 81.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.95% | 382 | 78.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.20% | 738 | 81.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.43% | 2,088 | 78.3% |