Japanese In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Japanese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Japanese In Labor Force | Age 20-64
79.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,187,220 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 79.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.13% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Japanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Japanese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Japanese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Japanese by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Guamanian/Chamorro (79.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (79.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Lebanese (79.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Tlingit-Haida (79.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Samoan (79.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Central Americans | 5.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 5.9 /100 | #227 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Panamanians | 5.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Alsatians | 5.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Native Hawaiians | 5.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Lebanese | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 4.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Japanese | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 3.2 /100 | #234 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 3.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Samoans | 2.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Immigrants from North America | 2.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 2.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Welsh | 2.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 79.0% |
Japanese In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.089% | 42.6% |
| Maximum | 46.8% | 90.8% |
| Range | 46.7% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 75.0% |
| Median | 6.7% | 78.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 73.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 80.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 9.9% |
Correlation Details
| Japanese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.089% | 191,236,115 | 79.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 32,062,027 | 80.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 11,053,025 | 79.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 5,586,569 | 80.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 2,875,177 | 79.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 1,550,067 | 79.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 1,269,770 | 78.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 537,392 | 78.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 401,596 | 78.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 83,848 | 81.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 184,192 | 80.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 208,256 | 82.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 147,545 | 78.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 638,209 | 79.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 60,107 | 77.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.30% | 473,882 | 76.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 68,008 | 73.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 74,695 | 73.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 41,240 | 78.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 5,600 | 69.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 104,251 | 75.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 70,818 | 77.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.54% | 65,608 | 77.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.83% | 278 | 69.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 41,001 | 78.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 59,153 | 74.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 4,145 | 83.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.84% | 12,324 | 77.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 11,678 | 80.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.38% | 2,911 | 90.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 59,460 | 69.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 27,848 | 76.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.25% | 2,588 | 60.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 114,737 | 77.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 1,364 | 77.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 2,215 | 60.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.30% | 411 | 84.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.47% | 868 | 51.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.03% | 7,118 | 42.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.70% | 1,575 | 58.9% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.12% | 5,478 | 56.1% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.24% | 921 | 50.7% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.73% | 32,323 | 80.5% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.86% | 388 | 80.1% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.81% | 219 | 82.1% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.82% | 220 | 90.2% |