Turkish In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Turkish
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Turkish In Labor Force | Age 20-64
80.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,859,072 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 80.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.35% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Turks and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Turks influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Turks simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Turks by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (80.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (80.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Peruvian (80.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sudan (80.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (80.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants from Greece | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 80.3% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 80.3% |
| Peruvians | 99.1 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 80.3% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 80.3% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 80.3% |
| Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 80.3% |
| Serbians | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 80.3% |
| Swedes | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 80.3% |
Turkish In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.061% | 53.3% |
| Maximum | 29.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.4% | 46.7% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 79.0% |
| Median | 3.3% | 80.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 77.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 81.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 7.1% |
Correlation Details
| Turkish Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.061% | 189,249,669 | 79.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 49,241,067 | 80.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 14,871,965 | 80.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 7,043,283 | 80.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 3,926,514 | 80.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 2,298,833 | 81.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 1,523,459 | 79.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 754,314 | 80.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 612,680 | 81.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 451,621 | 81.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 542,506 | 80.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 261,797 | 81.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 294,868 | 80.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 148,588 | 79.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 97,197 | 79.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 67,365 | 81.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 61,942 | 80.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.56% | 50,190 | 81.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 33,548 | 75.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 54,287 | 78.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 52,389 | 83.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 3,611 | 81.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 17,340 | 77.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 1,314 | 69.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 33,609 | 80.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 31,781 | 82.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.90% | 13,394 | 81.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 11,623 | 71.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 26,829 | 83.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.29% | 19,287 | 85.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.47% | 10,897 | 76.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 59 | 53.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 1,463 | 79.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30% | 434 | 58.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.51% | 381 | 73.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 1,616 | 73.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.44% | 21,950 | 83.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.66% | 4,150 | 81.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.36% | 11,458 | 77.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.17% | 1,669 | 81.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 5,476 | 77.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.04% | 1,857 | 62.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.91% | 235 | 79.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.16% | 148 | 82.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.27% | 375 | 88.8% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.41% | 34 | 100.0% |