Immigrants from Liberia In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Immigrants from Liberia In Labor Force | Age 20-64
80.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,283,849 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 80.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.40% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Liberia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Liberia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Immigrants from Liberia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (80.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Ugandan (80.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (80.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (80.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Czech (80.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants from Poland | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Paraguayans | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Immigrants from Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Ugandans | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Brazilians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Czechs | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 80.4% |
Immigrants from Liberia In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 68.1% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 90.7% |
| Range | 15.3% | 22.6% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 80.9% |
| Median | 2.4% | 81.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 78.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 83.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 4.8% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Liberia Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 92,542,380 | 79.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 16,925,035 | 79.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 8,253,340 | 80.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 4,346,148 | 80.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 4,457,993 | 78.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 1,577,371 | 81.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 1,693,992 | 80.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 912,468 | 80.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 503,893 | 83.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 376,329 | 82.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 335,805 | 79.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 183,456 | 83.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 448,826 | 81.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 347,729 | 82.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 103,306 | 82.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 518,373 | 76.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 89,285 | 79.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 107,193 | 79.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 121,884 | 83.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 8,705 | 85.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 21,905 | 74.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 113,593 | 83.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 176,668 | 86.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 42,534 | 83.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 56,572 | 82.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 23,101 | 77.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 9,507 | 90.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 52,655 | 84.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 47,729 | 75.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 33,620 | 86.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 95,009 | 84.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 91,692 | 68.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 6,295 | 90.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 50,464 | 81.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 12,017 | 83.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 13,811 | 81.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 5,234 | 80.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 35,244 | 83.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 17,716 | 85.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 15,709 | 81.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 30,544 | 82.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.34% | 8,596 | 76.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 48,577 | 87.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 23,363 | 81.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 32,912 | 87.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.86% | 1,425 | 74.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 11,051 | 83.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 14,550 | 68.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 22,337 | 81.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 21,620 | 85.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 23,804 | 71.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.14% | 84,951 | 86.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 37,169 | 83.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 32,967 | 84.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.49% | 22,493 | 76.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 13,075 | 76.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 35,780 | 76.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.48% | 468 | 72.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 28,392 | 85.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.07% | 10,682 | 71.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.21% | 1,658 | 73.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.34% | 2,849 | 80.6% |