Hungarian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Hungarian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Hungarian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
79.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
7.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,244,384 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 79.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.19% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hungarians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hungarians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Hungarians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants (79.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (79.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (79.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (79.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and French Canadian (79.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Immigrants from Armenia | 12.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 79.2% |
Immigrants from Norway | 12.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 79.2% |
Arabs | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 79.2% |
Immigrants from Western Asia | 11.0 /100 | #217 | Poor 79.2% |
Immigrants from England | 9.3 /100 | #218 | Tragic 79.2% |
French Canadians | 8.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 79.2% |
Immigrants | 7.7 /100 | #220 | Tragic 79.2% |
Hungarians | 7.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 79.2% |
Immigrants from Panama | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 79.1% |
Canadians | 6.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 79.1% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 6.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 79.1% |
Portuguese | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 79.1% |
Central Americans | 5.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 79.1% |
Immigrants from Western Europe | 5.9 /100 | #227 | Tragic 79.1% |
Panamanians | 5.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 79.1% |
Hungarian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.21% | 51.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 99.8% | 48.5% |
Mean | 22.2% | 79.7% |
Median | 17.5% | 79.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 75.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.7% | 83.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.5% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.1% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 11.1% |
Correlation Details
Hungarian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 357,316,940 | 78.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 85,838,010 | 79.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 21,883,958 | 79.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,718,036 | 79.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 4,105,806 | 79.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 2,282,186 | 79.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 1,851,783 | 79.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,316,681 | 80.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 909,197 | 80.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 463,093 | 81.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 445,106 | 80.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 156,812 | 80.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 150,307 | 80.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 120,507 | 80.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 84,345 | 82.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.75% | 71,120 | 76.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 48,575 | 78.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.71% | 28,723 | 68.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 20,816 | 74.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.72% | 13,611 | 77.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.32% | 6,745 | 82.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.94% | 55,636 | 78.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 26,068 | 83.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 18,859 | 75.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.06% | 77,181 | 75.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 2,823 | 77.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.32% | 2,717 | 81.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.26% | 589 | 83.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 795 | 84.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.05% | 7,256 | 59.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 266 | 79.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.42% | 134 | 79.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 49,883 | 69.1% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.94% | 853 | 84.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.23% | 1,920 | 87.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.80% | 947 | 64.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.42% | 1,921 | 77.7% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 35 | 97.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.49% | 610 | 91.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.34% | 28,607 | 64.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.57% | 2,035 | 64.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 7,385 | 73.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.21% | 224 | 84.5% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.00% | 125 | 63.0% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.63% | 64,313 | 73.6% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.29% | 6,460 | 64.1% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.04% | 864 | 76.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.60% | 188 | 100.0% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.34% | 307 | 77.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.68% | 638 | 77.2% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.82% | 959 | 60.5% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.23% | 258 | 78.4% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.96% | 3,858 | 78.6% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.30% | 871 | 90.8% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.83% | 133 | 100.0% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.50% | 48 | 100.0% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 9,614 | 73.3% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.81% | 34,544 | 60.3% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.12% | 1,481 | 64.0% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.79% | 315 | 92.1% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.76% | 173 | 51.5% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.67% | 60 | 100.0% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.00% | 25 | 100.0% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.00% | 20 | 100.0% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.00% | 10 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 19 | 100.0% |