Chickasaw vs Inupiat In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Inupiat
 In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Chickasaw
Inupiat
76.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
76.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Inupiat In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,293 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 76.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,348,375 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182 and weighted average of 76.1%, a difference of 0.16%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Inupiat | 
| Minimum | 38.5% | 33.3% | 
| Maximum | 87.5% | 93.9% | 
| Range | 49.0% | 60.6% | 
| Mean | 69.2% | 70.2% | 
| Median | 70.5% | 72.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.8% | 62.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 79.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 16.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 11.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 11.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Inupiat by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Cherokee (76.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Yaqui (76.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Yakama (75.8%, a difference of 0.55%), Ottawa (76.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and Black/African American (76.8%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Cherokee (76.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Yakama (75.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Yaqui (76.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Seminole (75.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and Dutch West Indian (75.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #308  | Tragic 77.0%  | 
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309  | Tragic 77.0%  | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #310  | Tragic 77.0%  | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311  | Tragic 77.0%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312  | Tragic 76.9%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #313  | Tragic 76.8%  | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 76.8%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 76.7%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 76.5%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 76.2%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 76.2%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 76.1%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 75.8%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 75.5%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 75.5%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 75.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 75.4%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 75.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 75.1%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 75.0%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 75.0%  |