Chickasaw vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Zimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Chickasaw
Zimbabweans
76.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,293 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 76.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,208,654 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.416 and weighted average of 81.0%, a difference of 6.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 38.5% | 65.2% |
| Maximum | 87.5% | 88.9% |
| Range | 49.0% | 23.7% |
| Mean | 69.2% | 81.1% |
| Median | 70.5% | 81.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.8% | 79.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 84.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Cherokee (76.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (76.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Yaqui (76.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Yakama (75.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ottawa (76.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 77.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 76.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 76.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 76.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 76.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 76.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 76.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 76.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 76.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 75.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 75.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 75.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 75.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 75.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 75.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (81.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Norwegian (81.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Thai (80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (80.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Bulgarian (81.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 81.3% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 81.3% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 81.1% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 81.1% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 81.1% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 81.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 81.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 81.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 80.9% |
| Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 80.9% |
| Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 80.8% |