Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
82.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,266,449 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 82.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.39% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ethiopians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Ethiopians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Bolivia (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (82.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Luxembourger (81.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Bolivian (81.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Somali (81.6%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 82.1% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 82.0% |
| Immigrants from Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 81.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 81.9% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 81.7% |
| Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 81.6% |
| Immigrants from Cameroon | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 81.6% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 81.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 81.5% |
| Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 81.5% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 81.3% |
| Immigrants from Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 81.3% |
| Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 81.3% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 81.1% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 81.1% |
Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.064% | 70.2% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 32.9% | 29.8% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 83.7% |
| Median | 4.9% | 83.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 81.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 85.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 5.0% |
Correlation Details
| Ethiopian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.064% | 143,253,421 | 78.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 34,870,543 | 80.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 14,257,552 | 80.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 7,873,284 | 81.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 3,681,962 | 81.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 3,648,446 | 83.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 2,842,926 | 82.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 2,517,090 | 83.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 1,584,290 | 83.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 1,750,526 | 83.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 964,864 | 83.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 807,230 | 82.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 384,379 | 81.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 545,505 | 83.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.39% | 176,307 | 84.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 381,336 | 81.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 263,366 | 82.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 212,401 | 84.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 469,698 | 82.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 236,713 | 85.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 286,416 | 83.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 229,912 | 86.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 62,039 | 84.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 100,273 | 81.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 156,701 | 84.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 125,408 | 81.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 78,603 | 85.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 264,356 | 86.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 48,890 | 82.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 84,569 | 85.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 132,495 | 81.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 164,741 | 81.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 55,439 | 83.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 94,052 | 83.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 26,996 | 86.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 4,017 | 70.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 26,595 | 82.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 45,072 | 91.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 44,863 | 82.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 14,098 | 86.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.89% | 61,169 | 76.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.05% | 24,581 | 76.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 101,620 | 89.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.43% | 26,573 | 84.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 18,324 | 84.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.40% | 30,927 | 81.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.65% | 64,730 | 86.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 535 | 91.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.36% | 25,823 | 86.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 50,049 | 87.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 38,318 | 81.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.38% | 5,359 | 78.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.67% | 26,684 | 80.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.73% | 1,885 | 97.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.66% | 3,514 | 79.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.16% | 4,023 | 75.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.31% | 14,553 | 77.9% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.66% | 121 | 88.7% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.48% | 105 | 100.0% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.97% | 182 | 100.0% |