Immigrants from Costa Rica In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Immigrants from Costa Rica In Labor Force | Age 20-64
79.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
64.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,275,671 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 79.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.41% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Costa Rica and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Costa Rica influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Immigrants from Costa Rica simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (79.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Nigerian (79.7%, a difference of 0.0%), South African (79.7%, a difference of 0.010%), German (79.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Cuba (79.7%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Senegalese | 69.1 /100 | #156 | Good 79.7% |
| Immigrants from China | 69.1 /100 | #157 | Good 79.7% |
| Austrians | 67.6 /100 | #158 | Good 79.7% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 66.7 /100 | #159 | Good 79.7% |
| Moroccans | 66.7 /100 | #160 | Good 79.7% |
| South Africans | 66.2 /100 | #161 | Good 79.7% |
| Germans | 65.2 /100 | #162 | Good 79.7% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 64.6 /100 | #163 | Good 79.7% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 64.4 /100 | #164 | Good 79.7% |
| Nigerians | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 79.7% |
| Okinawans | 62.7 /100 | #166 | Good 79.6% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 62.0 /100 | #167 | Good 79.6% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 61.8 /100 | #168 | Good 79.6% |
| Laotians | 58.4 /100 | #169 | Average 79.6% |
| Slavs | 54.0 /100 | #170 | Average 79.6% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.037% | 52.2% |
| Maximum | 20.0% | 91.4% |
| Range | 20.0% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 79.2% |
| Median | 2.5% | 80.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 76.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 82.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 6.8% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Costa Rica Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.037% | 161,394,961 | 79.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 25,343,999 | 79.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 8,018,996 | 79.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 3,473,044 | 79.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 1,722,322 | 80.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 1,206,712 | 79.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 989,147 | 78.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 405,752 | 78.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 381,481 | 81.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 236,557 | 76.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 232,111 | 79.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 121,883 | 79.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 218,784 | 82.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 59,681 | 82.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 54,045 | 80.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 5,324 | 80.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 72,628 | 82.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 4,589 | 73.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 28,521 | 76.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 52,938 | 83.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 9,266 | 76.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 26,624 | 80.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 11,166 | 87.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 13,417 | 82.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.43% | 329 | 67.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 24,748 | 83.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 2,661 | 72.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 45,949 | 82.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 33,541 | 82.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 3,138 | 86.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 98 | 52.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 4,791 | 81.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 19,759 | 73.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 5,226 | 69.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 1,760 | 85.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 923 | 70.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 657 | 90.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 1,539 | 77.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 479 | 74.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 2,714 | 71.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 501 | 63.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.77% | 8,287 | 83.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 1,519 | 91.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 14,789 | 85.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.29% | 318 | 82.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 11,906 | 86.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 167 | 77.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.49% | 569 | 79.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.56% | 4,771 | 81.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.03% | 584 | 89.7% |