Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from North America
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from North America
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,319
SOCIAL INDEX
80.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
78th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from North America Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 418,911,933 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Immigrants from North America.
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from North America Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $91,860, a difference of 15.4%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $60,265, a difference of 14.4%), and median earnings ($57,114 compared to $50,108, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.2%), per capita income ($52,660 compared to $49,302, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $64,856, a difference of 8.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from North America |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,660 | Exceptional $49,302 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,956 | Exceptional $112,151 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $106,057 | Exceptional $91,860 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,114 | Exceptional $50,108 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,960 | Exceptional $60,265 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,324 | Exceptional $41,319 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,818 | Exceptional $53,307 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $116,626 | Exceptional $102,407 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $124,188 | Exceptional $109,198 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,103 | Exceptional $64,856 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.3% | Tragic 28.4% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from North America Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.87%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from North America |
| Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 12.9% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Fair 12.9% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Excellent 20.3% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Poor 16.6% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.3% | Excellent 28.5% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from North America Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from North America |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Excellent 10.2% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Average 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Average 7.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Poor 9.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from North America Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from North America |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 63.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Exceptional 38.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Exceptional 75.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Good 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Fair 84.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Poor 82.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from North America Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 23.8%), divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (50.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.12, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (66.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from North America |
| Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Poor 64.0% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.0% | Tragic 26.6% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.4% | Average 12.1% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from North America Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from North America |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Exceptional 91.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Exceptional 57.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Excellent 20.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from North America Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.5%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from North America |
| No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| 1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
| 8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.0% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 94.0% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.8% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 91.0% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Exceptional 87.8% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Exceptional 69.0% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 63.0% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.7% | Exceptional 50.1% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Exceptional 41.7% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.7% | Exceptional 17.2% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from North America Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.4%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 34.2%), and male disability (9.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.58%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 7.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from North America |
| Disability | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Fair 12.3% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.4% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Good 11.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 22.1% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Exceptional 45.7% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Average 2.2% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 6.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.4% |