South African vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,362,028 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.385% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 385.1 Immigrants from North America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $53,307, a difference of 3.7%), median male earnings ($61,460 compared to $60,265, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($93,379 compared to $91,860, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,719 compared to $109,198, a difference of 0.48%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,160 compared to $102,407, a difference of 0.74%), and median family income ($113,229 compared to $112,151, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 8.3%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.010%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.19%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.0%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.0%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%).