Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,359,480 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.646% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 645.8 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $33,931, a difference of 50.0%), median family income ($114,826 compared to $83,639, a difference of 37.3%), and median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $44,960, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $50,422, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $52,801, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 68.0%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 56.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.79%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.0%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 57.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.95%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 63.9%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 41.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 120.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 115.6%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 104.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 25.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.50%), female disability (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%).