Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,051,484 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $33,931, a difference of 33.3%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $83,639, a difference of 27.3%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $44,960, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,422, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $33,236, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 50.9%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.4%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.98%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 72.7%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.43%), disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.82%).