Immigrants from Malaysia vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,884,127 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 54.6 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($96,292 compared to $76,387, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $89,811, a difference of 25.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $85,899, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $48,977, a difference of 10.6%), and median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $36,920, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 33.6%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 44.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 33.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.82%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 30.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.5%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 52.0%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 37.8%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.4%).