Immigrants from Laos vs English Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
English
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Laos

English

Fair
Good
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,730
SOCIAL INDEX
64.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
146th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

English Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,448,925 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of English within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in English. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 97.4 English.
Immigrants from Laos Integration in English Communities

Immigrants from Laos vs English Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and English communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 23.7%), per capita income ($37,857 compared to $43,982, a difference of 16.2%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $55,747, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $50,805, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $38,196, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $46,334, a difference of 8.0%).
Immigrants from Laos vs English Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LaosEnglish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,857
Average
$43,982
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,239
Good
$103,684
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,327
Average
$84,915
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,884
Average
$46,334
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,190
Good
$55,747
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,841
Tragic
$38,196
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,041
Tragic
$50,805
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,553
Average
$94,429
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,909
Good
$102,021
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,722
Good
$61,487
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Tragic
29.5%

Immigrants from Laos vs English Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and English communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 41.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.75%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (22.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Laos vs English Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LaosEnglish
Poverty
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.6%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Laos vs English Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and English communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.91%).
Immigrants from Laos vs English Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LaosEnglish
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
16.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs English Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and English communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Immigrants from Laos vs English Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LaosEnglish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
63.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.6%
Exceptional
42.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
77.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
82.2%

Immigrants from Laos vs English Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and English communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.35%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Laos vs English Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LaosEnglish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Exceptional
65.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.0%
Average
31.7%

Immigrants from Laos vs English Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and English communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.99%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Laos vs English Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LaosEnglish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Exceptional
93.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
61.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
23.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Laos vs English Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and English communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 127.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Laos vs English Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LaosEnglish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
87.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Excellent
66.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.7%
Good
60.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Average
46.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Fair
37.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Laos vs English Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and English communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), female disability (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Laos vs English Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LaosEnglish
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%