Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States [ 101 - 200 ]

	Zip Code	% Renter-Occupied	vs State	vs National
101.	50051, Iowa	1.6%	28.5%(-26.9)#6	35.2%(-33.6)#101
102.	51363, Iowa	1.6%	28.5%(-26.9)#7	35.2%(-33.6)#102
103.	11762, New York	1.6%	45.7%(-44.1)#6	35.2%(-33.6)#103
104.	52569, Iowa	1.6%	28.5%(-26.9)#8	35.2%(-33.6)#104
105.	65064, Missouri	1.6%	32.4%(-30.8)#4	35.2%(-33.6)#105
106.	20607, Maryland	1.6%	32.5%(-30.9)#10	35.2%(-33.6)#106
107.	58737, North Dakota	1.6%	36.8%(-35.2)#4	35.2%(-33.5)#107
108.	49653, Michigan	1.7%	27.5%(-25.9)#4	35.2%(-33.5)#108
109.	31025, Georgia	1.7%	35.0%(-33.3)#1	35.2%(-33.5)#109
110.	67520, Kansas	1.7%	33.1%(-31.5)#6	35.2%(-33.5)#110
111.	67734, Kansas	1.7%	33.1%(-31.5)#7	35.2%(-33.5)#111
112.	79078, Texas	1.7%	37.6%(-35.9)#4	35.2%(-33.5)#112
113.	18954, Pennsylvania	1.7%	30.8%(-29.1)#7	35.2%(-33.5)#113
114.	48822, Michigan	1.7%	27.5%(-25.8)#5	35.2%(-33.5)#114
115.	26623, West Virginia	1.7%	25.8%(-24.2)#4	35.2%(-33.5)#115
116.	31756, Georgia	1.7%	35.0%(-33.3)#2	35.2%(-33.5)#116
117.	58758, North Dakota	1.7%	36.8%(-35.1)#5	35.2%(-33.5)#117
118.	21737, Maryland	1.7%	32.5%(-30.8)#11	35.2%(-33.5)#118
119.	57446, South Dakota	1.7%	31.6%(-29.9)#4	35.2%(-33.5)#119
120.	84729, Utah	1.7%	29.3%(-27.6)#5	35.2%(-33.5)#120
121.	93287, California	1.7%	44.4%(-42.7)#2	35.2%(-33.5)#121
122.	49919, Michigan	1.7%	27.5%(-25.8)#6	35.2%(-33.5)#122
123.	13633, New York	1.7%	45.7%(-44.0)#7	35.2%(-33.5)#123
124.	70446, Louisiana	1.7%	32.8%(-31.1)#2	35.2%(-33.5)#124
125.	08061, New Jersey	1.7%	36.1%(-34.4)#3	35.2%(-33.5)#125
126.	05474, Vermont	1.7%	27.3%(-25.6)#2	35.2%(-33.5)#126
127.	71745, Arkansas	1.7%	33.8%(-32.1)#4	35.2%(-33.5)#127
128.	54654, Wisconsin	1.7%	32.3%(-30.6)#3	35.2%(-33.5)#128
129.	08319, New Jersey	1.7%	36.1%(-34.4)#4	35.2%(-33.5)#129
130.	12777, New York	1.7%	45.7%(-44.0)#8	35.2%(-33.4)#130
131.	45340, Ohio	1.8%	33.2%(-31.4)#3	35.2%(-33.4)#131
132.	26320, West Virginia	1.8%	25.8%(-24.1)#5	35.2%(-33.4)#132
133.	36317, Alabama	1.8%	30.3%(-28.5)#1	35.2%(-33.4)#133
134.	84309, Utah	1.8%	29.3%(-27.5)#6	35.2%(-33.4)#134
135.	15778, Pennsylvania	1.8%	30.8%(-29.0)#8	35.2%(-33.4)#135
136.	55602, Minnesota	1.8%	27.7%(-25.9)#6	35.2%(-33.4)#136
137.	64441, Missouri	1.8%	32.4%(-30.6)#5	35.2%(-33.4)#137
138.	98834, Washington	1.8%	36.2%(-34.4)#3	35.2%(-33.3)#138
139.	18065, Pennsylvania	1.9%	30.8%(-29.0)#9	35.2%(-33.3)#139
140.	48636, Michigan	1.9%	27.5%(-25.6)#7	35.2%(-33.3)#140
141.	54141, Wisconsin	1.9%	32.3%(-30.5)#4	35.2%(-33.3)#141
142.	84638, Utah	1.9%	29.3%(-27.4)#7	35.2%(-33.3)#142
143.	04253, Maine	1.9%	26.5%(-24.7)#2	35.2%(-33.3)#143
144.	58625, North Dakota	1.9%	36.8%(-34.9)#6	35.2%(-33.3)#144
145.	29685, South Carolina	1.9%	29.1%(-27.2)#1	35.2%(-33.3)#145
146.	03036, New Hampshire	1.9%	27.7%(-25.8)#1	35.2%(-33.3)#146
147.	15546, Pennsylvania	1.9%	30.8%(-28.9)#10	35.2%(-33.3)#147
148.	63430, Missouri	1.9%	32.4%(-30.5)#6	35.2%(-33.3)#148
149.	59931, Montana	1.9%	31.0%(-29.0)#2	35.2%(-33.3)#149
150.	46730, Indiana	1.9%	29.9%(-27.9)#2	35.2%(-33.2)#150
151.	17329, Pennsylvania	2.0%	30.8%(-28.9)#11	35.2%(-33.2)#151
152.	66944, Kansas	2.0%	33.1%(-31.2)#8	35.2%(-33.2)#152
153.	56685, Minnesota	2.0%	27.7%(-25.7)#7	35.2%(-33.2)#153
154.	26717, West Virginia	2.0%	25.8%(-23.8)#6	35.2%(-33.2)#154
155.	76270, Texas	2.0%	37.6%(-35.6)#5	35.2%(-33.2)#155
156.	49967, Michigan	2.0%	27.5%(-25.5)#8	35.2%(-33.2)#156
157.	41564, Kentucky	2.0%	31.9%(-29.8)#2	35.2%(-33.1)#157
158.	29939, South Carolina	2.0%	29.1%(-27.0)#2	35.2%(-33.1)#158
159.	41527, Kentucky	2.0%	31.9%(-29.8)#3	35.2%(-33.1)#159
160.	70772, Louisiana	2.1%	32.8%(-30.8)#3	35.2%(-33.1)#160
161.	26714, West Virginia	2.1%	25.8%(-23.8)#7	35.2%(-33.1)#161
162.	50229, Iowa	2.1%	28.5%(-26.4)#9	35.2%(-33.1)#162
163.	29915, South Carolina	2.1%	29.1%(-27.0)#3	35.2%(-33.1)#163
164.	10969, New York	2.1%	45.7%(-43.6)#9	35.2%(-33.1)#164
165.	15688, Pennsylvania	2.1%	30.8%(-28.7)#12	35.2%(-33.1)#165
166.	64401, Missouri	2.1%	32.4%(-30.3)#7	35.2%(-33.1)#166
167.	63013, Missouri	2.1%	32.4%(-30.3)#8	35.2%(-33.1)#167
168.	38455, Tennessee	2.1%	32.9%(-30.9)#2	35.2%(-33.1)#168
169.	24072, Virginia	2.1%	33.1%(-31.1)#5	35.2%(-33.1)#169
170.	87305, New Mexico	2.1%	31.3%(-29.2)#1	35.2%(-33.1)#170
171.	66070, Kansas	2.1%	33.1%(-31.0)#9	35.2%(-33.1)#171
172.	08836, New Jersey	2.1%	36.1%(-34.0)#5	35.2%(-33.1)#172
173.	76484, Texas	2.1%	37.6%(-35.5)#6	35.2%(-33.1)#173
174.	25124, West Virginia	2.1%	25.8%(-23.7)#8	35.2%(-33.1)#174
175.	70632, Louisiana	2.1%	32.8%(-30.7)#4	35.2%(-33.1)#175
176.	55001, Minnesota	2.1%	27.7%(-25.6)#8	35.2%(-33.1)#176
177.	10994, New York	2.1%	45.7%(-43.6)#10	35.2%(-33.0)#177
178.	73025, Oklahoma	2.1%	34.1%(-31.9)#1	35.2%(-33.0)#178
179.	61516, Illinois	2.2%	33.3%(-31.2)#9	35.2%(-33.0)#179
180.	83806, Idaho	2.2%	28.0%(-25.8)#2	35.2%(-33.0)#180
181.	33473, Florida	2.2%	33.1%(-31.0)#1	35.2%(-33.0)#181
182.	46950, Indiana	2.2%	29.9%(-27.7)#3	35.2%(-33.0)#182
183.	45658, Ohio	2.2%	33.2%(-31.0)#4	35.2%(-33.0)#183
184.	23106, Virginia	2.2%	33.1%(-31.0)#6	35.2%(-33.0)#184
185.	19951, Delaware	2.2%	28.0%(-25.8)#2	35.2%(-33.0)#185
186.	45775, Ohio	2.2%	33.2%(-31.0)#5	35.2%(-33.0)#186
187.	03810, New Hampshire	2.2%	27.7%(-25.5)#2	35.2%(-32.9)#187
188.	87310, New Mexico	2.3%	31.3%(-29.1)#2	35.2%(-32.9)#188
189.	22736, Virginia	2.3%	33.1%(-30.9)#7	35.2%(-32.9)#189
190.	67836, Kansas	2.3%	33.1%(-30.9)#10	35.2%(-32.9)#190
191.	45838, Ohio	2.3%	33.2%(-30.9)#6	35.2%(-32.9)#191
192.	42020, Kentucky	2.3%	31.9%(-29.6)#4	35.2%(-32.9)#192
193.	48363, Michigan	2.3%	27.5%(-25.2)#9	35.2%(-32.9)#193
194.	49323, Michigan	2.3%	27.5%(-25.2)#10	35.2%(-32.9)#194
195.	60072, Illinois	2.3%	33.3%(-31.0)#10	35.2%(-32.9)#195
196.	57242, South Dakota	2.3%	31.6%(-29.3)#5	35.2%(-32.9)#196
197.	56356, Minnesota	2.3%	27.7%(-25.4)#9	35.2%(-32.9)#197
198.	48002, Michigan	2.3%	27.5%(-25.2)#11	35.2%(-32.9)#198
199.	67149, Kansas	2.3%	33.1%(-30.8)#11	35.2%(-32.9)#199
200.	11766, New York	2.3%	45.7%(-43.4)#11	35.2%(-32.9)#200

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10