Latvian vs Immigrants from Korea Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from Korea
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from Korea
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Immigrants from Korea Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,091,398 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 407,349,418 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 2.9%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Immigrants from Korea |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 43.4% |
Range | 98.8% | 42.2% |
Mean | 20.0% | 11.6% |
Median | 14.5% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.8% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.6% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from Korea by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Asian (13.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Bulgarian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |