Iranian vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Iranian
Cherokee
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Iranians
Cherokee
12.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 311,679,854 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,336,049 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 60.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.88% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 18.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 17.1% | 94.7% |
Mean | 8.2% | 30.7% |
Median | 7.7% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 34.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.66%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |