Iranian vs Tongan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Iranian
Tongan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Iranians
Tongans
12.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Tongan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 311,679,854 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,473,172 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 9.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Tongan |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 29.2% |
| Range | 17.1% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 8.2% | 12.8% |
| Median | 7.7% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Tongans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 2.6%), Bhutanese (12.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |