Iranian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Iranian
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Iranian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
9.5%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 311,948,980 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 9.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iranians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iranians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iranians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Iranians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Canada (9.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from North America (9.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Celtic (9.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Canadian (9.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Taiwanese | 91.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants from South Central Asia | 91.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 90.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 90.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 90.3 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 90.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Iranians | 90.1 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants from North America | 89.9 /100 | #64 | Excellent 9.5% |
| Celtics | 89.9 /100 | #65 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Canadians | 89.8 /100 | #66 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 89.8 /100 | #67 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Bolivians | 89.8 /100 | #68 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Romanians | 89.5 /100 | #69 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Samoans | 89.5 /100 | #70 | Excellent 9.6% |
Iranian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.096% | 0.31% |
| Maximum | 48.7% | 22.7% |
| Range | 48.6% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| Median | 6.1% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 3.9% |
Correlation Details
| Iranian Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.096% | 223,691,234 | 10.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 46,440,151 | 9.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 16,191,008 | 8.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 7,979,493 | 7.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 4,087,524 | 7.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 6,284,690 | 13.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 1,835,239 | 7.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 1,050,968 | 7.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 808,554 | 9.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.44% | 416,607 | 6.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 602,874 | 9.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 423,253 | 10.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 306,427 | 8.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 454,641 | 9.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 145,187 | 9.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 64,057 | 4.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 80,520 | 6.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 126,679 | 9.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 108,912 | 7.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.04% | 31,284 | 11.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 153,564 | 6.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.49% | 13,929 | 7.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 11,429 | 7.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 113,498 | 10.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.30% | 66,551 | 6.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.49% | 35,853 | 6.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.87% | 1,382 | 1.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.05% | 71,019 | 11.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 3,118 | 3.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.58% | 10,993 | 5.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.70% | 64,196 | 6.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.96% | 53,901 | 6.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.21% | 9,524 | 10.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 50,611 | 9.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.81% | 39,181 | 8.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.40% | 2,483 | 3.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.70% | 1,299 | 12.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.99% | 7,729 | 3.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.50% | 11,034 | 6.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.51% | 2,935 | 3.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.88% | 363 | 22.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.35% | 27,139 | 14.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.78% | 32,903 | 9.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 19,627 | 9.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.82% | 1,142 | 1.6% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.74% | 8,394 | 4.4% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.52% | 5,493 | 0.31% |
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.71% | 388 | 15.9% |