Immigrants from Romania vs Asian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Asian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Asians
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Asian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,918,121 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,886,989 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 0.42%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Asian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 21.9% |
Range | 29.7% | 20.0% |
Mean | 11.5% | 10.3% |
Median | 10.5% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Asians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |