Immigrants from Romania vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Chinese
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,918,121 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 15.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 31.2% | 25.9% |
| Range | 29.7% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 10.8% |
| Median | 10.5% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |