Immigrants from Romania vs African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Africans
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,918,121 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,508,235 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 41.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | African |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 31.2% | 69.8% |
| Range | 29.7% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 22.8% |
| Median | 10.5% | 20.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 28.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 11.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |