Hungarian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Hungarian
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Hungarian Receiving Food Stamps
11.0%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
85.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,983,942 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 11.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.51% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hungarians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hungarians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Hungarians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Syrian (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.0%, a difference of 0.27%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Chilean (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants from Moldova | 88.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Hmong | 88.4 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Celtics | 87.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 86.7 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Chileans | 86.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 86.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Syrians | 85.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 83.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 83.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Brazilians | 83.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Soviet Union | 83.1 /100 | #150 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 81.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 81.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 11.1% |
Hungarian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 56.7% | 64.4% |
| Range | 56.5% | 59.7% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 16.3% |
| Median | 14.0% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.6% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.9% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 12.7% |
Correlation Details
| Hungarian Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 356,331,554 | 12.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 85,314,941 | 9.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 21,608,007 | 8.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,562,979 | 9.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 4,028,923 | 8.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 2,186,938 | 9.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 1,821,824 | 10.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,288,302 | 10.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 886,980 | 10.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 450,188 | 7.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 437,199 | 15.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 154,143 | 9.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 147,163 | 14.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 116,916 | 6.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 78,895 | 6.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.75% | 63,217 | 18.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 45,270 | 6.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 27,389 | 10.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.15% | 17,632 | 8.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 10,840 | 12.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.33% | 5,517 | 10.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 53,690 | 22.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 25,979 | 6.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 18,533 | 5.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.06% | 76,806 | 24.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.66% | 2,022 | 11.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.32% | 2,717 | 5.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.04% | 178 | 9.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.55% | 433 | 8.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.05% | 7,084 | 5.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 102 | 19.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.42% | 67 | 30.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 48,627 | 24.1% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.65% | 51 | 14.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.13% | 1,164 | 8.5% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.80% | 947 | 15.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.42% | 1,792 | 18.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 30 | 26.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.35% | 28,287 | 38.5% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.60% | 1,102 | 7.6% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 7,385 | 16.1% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.63% | 64,193 | 21.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.29% | 6,460 | 46.9% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.04% | 192 | 4.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.60% | 188 | 10.4% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.17% | 71 | 14.5% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.88% | 897 | 31.1% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.23% | 258 | 4.7% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.96% | 3,858 | 16.7% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.30% | 871 | 14.1% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 9,578 | 64.4% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.81% | 34,368 | 41.1% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.06% | 962 | 59.0% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.76% | 173 | 21.3% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.67% | 60 | 14.7% |