Chickasaw vs Lebanese Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Lebanese
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Chickasaw
Lebanese
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Lebanese Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,242,297 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 17.7%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Lebanese |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 32.8% | 33.2% |
| Range | 30.3% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 13.3% |
| Median | 14.2% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Taiwanese | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 83.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Brazilians | 83.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Soviet Union | 83.1 /100 | #150 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 81.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 81.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Lebanese | 81.6 /100 | #153 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Armenians | 81.4 /100 | #154 | Excellent 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 80.4 /100 | #155 | Excellent 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 75.6 /100 | #156 | Good 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.2 /100 | #157 | Good 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 72.6 /100 | #158 | Good 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 70.4 /100 | #159 | Good 11.4% |
| French Canadians | 69.5 /100 | #160 | Good 11.4% |