Cherokee Single Father Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 376,598,860 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 19.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.50% in poverty level among single fathers.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Cherokee and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Cherokee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Cherokee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Father Poverty

In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Inupiat (19.5%, a difference of 0.85%), Creek (19.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Slovak (19.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Pennsylvania German (20.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and American (20.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Father Poverty
Delaware	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 18.9%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 19.0%
Osage	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 19.0%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 19.1%
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 19.2%
Slovaks	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 19.3%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 19.5%
Cherokee	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 19.6%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 19.8%
Pennsylvania Germans	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 20.0%
Americans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 20.1%
Blacks/African Americans	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 20.4%
Immigrants from Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 20.6%
Choctaw	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 20.7%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 21.1%

Cherokee Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Cherokee Data	Single Father Poverty Data
Minimum	0.21%	5.6%
Maximum	92.2%	100.0%
Range	92.0%	94.4%
Mean	27.1%	32.7%
Median	22.4%	25.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.0%	17.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	38.6%	37.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	27.6%	20.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	20.9%	23.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	20.8%	23.4%

Correlation Details

Cherokee Percentile	Sample Size	Single Father Poverty
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21%	317,973,804	16.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67%	41,205,813	18.4%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18%	7,491,858	23.5%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74%	3,606,578	22.2%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22%	1,787,593	25.8%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73%	957,478	29.7%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22%	450,936	32.8%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75%	394,225	27.0%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24%	228,251	30.7%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.81%	586,058	21.2%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24%	331,591	22.5%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.81%	284,192	16.0%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11%	75,094	23.8%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78%	111,063	20.2%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28%	111,382	23.5%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.77%	154,085	17.3%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33%	55,475	31.3%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72%	86,298	16.1%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29%	45,681	28.3%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86%	20,541	41.7%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.23%	39,228	33.6%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.67%	19,668	22.1%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.31%	6,917	27.6%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90%	14,676	28.2%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.38%	12,825	19.8%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.91%	3,377	59.9%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.14%	4,991	22.3%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.92%	14,990	9.7%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.33%	34,515	22.7%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80%	39,976	35.2%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.29%	10,677	16.7%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.83%	5,767	42.5%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.20%	15,682	9.3%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.90%	70,130	10.5%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.26%	9,483	18.9%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.87%	5,726	37.1%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.12%	27,932	7.0%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.63%	9,428	29.6%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.05%	1,312	24.8%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.16%	29,294	14.7%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.91%	17,213	5.6%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.11%	5,524	16.7%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.71%	12,798	27.0%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.11%	2,451	61.4%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.78%	3,543	18.2%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.72%	3,765	45.5%
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.27%	11,900	16.5%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.83%	729	7.4%
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.43%	17,205	32.6%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.65%	8,524	35.9%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.20%	5,898	22.8%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.56%	64	100.0%
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.42%	19,115	37.9%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.72%	2,453	17.1%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.74%	741	75.9%
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.73%	9,419	28.9%
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.42%	286	40.0%
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.81%	5,134	9.1%
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.26%	3,788	50.2%
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.83%	6,309	16.1%
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.24%	183	100.0%
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.49%	16,782	15.8%
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.71%	4,500	35.9%
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.43%	6,257	22.6%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.87%	11,892	12.8%
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.42%	3,587	28.6%
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.69%	31,421	27.7%
[ 39.5% - 40.0% ] 39.52%	3,305	32.4%
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.34%	5,692	17.1%
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.23%	1,266	14.3%
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93%	1,772	18.5%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.86%	840	60.0%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.03%	2,900	10.5%
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.34%	1,447	97.0%
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.42%	4,589	12.2%
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.84%	1,548	73.5%
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.89%	318	100.0%
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.65%	3,732	22.0%
[ 53.0% - 53.5% ] 53.37%	1,186	20.8%
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.07%	12,167	38.6%
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.93%	277	60.0%
[ 65.0% - 65.5% ] 65.38%	598	60.0%
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.19%	1,279	14.3%
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.72%	535	54.5%
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.44%	1,604	53.5%
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.02%	6,854	31.4%
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.85%	726	100.0%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.21%	154	100.0%

Cherokee Single Father Poverty

COMPARE

Cherokee Single Father PovertyTragic

Cherokee Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Father Poverty

Cherokee Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Cherokee Single Father Poverty
Tragic