Alsatian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alsatian
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Alsatian Ambulatory Disability
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,981 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 6.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.22% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Alsatians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Alsatians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Alsatians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants from Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Alsatian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alsatian Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.016% | 0.97% |
| Maximum | 31.0% | 29.2% |
| Range | 31.0% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 3.8% | 7.7% |
| Median | 1.7% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.79% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 5.3% |
Correlation Details
| Alsatian Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.016% | 81,405,599 | 6.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 928,029 | 6.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 113,092 | 6.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 119,006 | 6.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 32,091 | 5.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 42,079 | 5.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 5,784 | 6.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 262 | 12.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 4,355 | 6.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 2,792 | 5.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 5,440 | 9.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 1,604 | 9.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 715 | 12.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 1,573 | 5.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 243 | 7.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,321 | 29.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 70 | 6.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 827 | 6.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.52% | 1,848 | 5.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 2,994 | 11.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 9,202 | 6.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.25% | 723 | 0.97% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.02% | 332 | 2.1% |