Alsatian vs Immigrants from Panama Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alsatian
Immigrants from Panama
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Alsatians
Immigrants from Panama
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Immigrants from Panama Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,678,421 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,145,499 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.35%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alsatian | Immigrants from Panama |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 23.1% | 30.5% |
| Range | 19.7% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 14.5% |
| Median | 10.5% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Immigrants from Panama by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |