Navajo vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Navajo
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Navajo
Luxembourgers
30.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,099,770 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465 and weighted average of 30.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,837,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 121.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 7.1% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 37.5% |
Range | 92.9% | 35.9% |
Mean | 39.7% | 10.7% |
Median | 36.9% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.9% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.4% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.0% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.9% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 2.5%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 4.0%), Pima (29.0%, a difference of 4.2%), Yuman (28.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and Tohono O'odham (31.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Australia (13.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Scotland (13.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |