Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,807,987 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 51.7 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $107,258, a difference of 9.6%), median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $62,728, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $114,407, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $52,503, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $66,672, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $44,066, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.9%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.3%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.25%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.70%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.8%).