Latvian vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,536,222 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.283% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 283.0 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.4%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $51,368, a difference of 2.5%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $118,325, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($53,001 compared to $52,960, a difference of 0.080%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $44,066, a difference of 0.28%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $96,964, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.2%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.59%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.5%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.46%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and college, under 1 year (71.6% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.70%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%).