South American Indian vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,230,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.843% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 1,842.5 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $51,368, a difference of 16.2%), median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $62,728, a difference of 15.1%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $118,325, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $52,503, a difference of 0.91%), householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $66,672, a difference of 7.2%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.050%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.57%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.9%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.8%).