Tsimshian vs Syrian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
✖
Syrian
✖
Female Poverty
✖
Female Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Syrians
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Syrian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,159,377 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.60%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Syrian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.87% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 45.6% |
| Range | 25.6% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 11.0% |
| Median | 13.1% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Syrians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |