Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Malaysia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Malaysia
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,903,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.71%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Malaysia |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 49.6% |
| Range | 25.6% | 46.2% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 12.6% |
| Median | 13.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Immigrants from Malaysia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |