Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Select to Compare
Disability Age 35 to 64
Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64
16.7%
DISABILITY | AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 16.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.14% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tsimshian influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 within an area, or if Tsimshian simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian Data | Disability Age 35 to 64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.024% | 11.4% |
| Maximum | 75.9% | 29.2% |
| Range | 75.8% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 19.4% |
| Median | 3.1% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 27.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.4% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.5% | 6.8% |
Correlation Details
| Tsimshian Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.024% | 15,404,738 | 11.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 171,789 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 15,580 | 14.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 3,609 | 29.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 804 | 25.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 1,736 | 15.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 822 | 15.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 838 | 22.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 13,913 | 11.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.77% | 8,168 | 12.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 656 | 22.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.76% | 361 | 29.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.79% | 546 | 11.5% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.40% | 1,465 | 27.9% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.85% | 1,437 | 27.9% |