South African vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
South African
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
South Africans
Celtics
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,602,695 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.734 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 9.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Celtic |
Minimum | 4.6% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 60.5% | 70.9% |
Range | 55.9% | 67.6% |
Mean | 17.6% | 25.7% |
Median | 14.3% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |