Potawatomi vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Osage
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Potawatomi
Osage
19.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,080,271 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 3.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi | Osage |
Minimum | 5.7% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 67.2% |
Range | 54.3% | 60.5% |
Mean | 25.7% | 21.1% |
Median | 22.2% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |