Immigrants from Jordan vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,197,241 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 544,607,690 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 1.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Jordan	Scottish
Minimum	1.6%	2.1%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	98.4%	97.9%
Mean	19.3%	38.1%
Median	14.0%	25.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.4%	14.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.4%	52.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.0%	37.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.0%	30.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	16.9%	30.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Scottish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Irish	91.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Peruvians	91.2 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.4%
Scottish	91.0 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Norway	90.8 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Albanians	90.5 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	90.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Puget Sound Salish	90.1 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	89.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.4%
Brazilians	89.6 /100 \| #133	Excellent 15.4%
Immigrants \| Spain	89.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.5%
Czechoslovakians	89.0 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.5%
Native Hawaiians	89.0 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.5%
South Africans	88.7 /100 \| #137	Excellent 15.5%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	88.2 /100 \| #138	Excellent 15.5%
Armenians	87.9 /100 \| #139	Excellent 15.5%
New Zealanders	87.2 /100 \| #140	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Jordan	87.2 /100 \| #141	Excellent 15.6%
Canadians	87.1 /100 \| #142	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Peru	86.6 /100 \| #143	Excellent 15.6%